Table 2. Differences in cerebrospinal fluid metabolite concentrations between patients with an infectious disease (Hisotoplasma, Lyme, rabies, West Nile virus) and non-infectious conditions (multiple sclerosis, controls)a.
Metabolite | Potential Pathway(s) Involved | Effect Sizeb | P-valuec |
---|---|---|---|
Betaine | 1-carbon metabolism/ cell volume/choline oxidation | 0.58 | 0.0022 |
Formated | 1-carbon metabolism/acetate synthesis | 0.68 | <0.0001 |
Glycinee | 1-carbon metabolism/glutathione synthesis/excitotoxicity | 0.62 | 0.0011 |
Cholinee | 1-carbon metabolism/lipid turnover | 0.45 | 0.0166 |
Serine | 1-carbon metabolism/protein catabolism | -0.52 | 0.0059 |
Pyroglutamatee | Amino acid/glutathione metabolism | 0.80 | <0.0001 |
N-Acetylneuraminate | Amino sugar metabolism/innate immunity | -0.48 | 0.0117 |
Fructose | Carbohydrate | -0.52 | 0.0059 |
Acetatee | Carbohydrate and fatty acid metabolism | -0.44 | 0.0182 |
2-Oxoglutarate | Cell volume/TCA cycle/amino acid metabolism | 0.39 | 0.0387 |
N-Acetylaspartate | Cell volume/TCA cycle/myelin synthesis | 0.37 | 0.0499 |
Glutamate | Cell volume/TCA cycle/neurotransmitter | 0.82 | <0.0001 |
Methanolf | Drug metabolite; microbial metabolism | -0.46 | 0.0140 |
Pyruvated | Energy metabolism | 0.55 | 0.0007 |
Lactatee | Energy metabolism | 0.21 | 0.0059 |
Carnitined | Fatty acid catabolism | 0.54 | 0.0009 |
2-Hydroxybutyratee | Glutathione synthesis/energy metabolism | 0.65 | 0.0007 |
Acetonee | Ketone bodies | 0.70 | 0.0002 |
3-Hydroxybutyratee | Ketone bodies | 0.59 | 0.0022 |
Acetoacetatee | Ketone bodies | 0.51 | 0.0070 |
Isobutyrate | Microbial metabolism | -0.41 | 0.0292 |
Isopropanol | Microbial/ketone metabolism | 0.76 | 0.0001 |
2-Oxoisocaproated | Organic acid | 0.39 | 0.0170 |
Urea | Protein catabolism | 0.38 | 0.0444 |
Phenylalanine | Protein catabolism | 0.37 | 0.0494 |
Quinolinated | Tryptophan metabolism/excitotoxicity | 0.51 | 0.0016 |
Ornithined | Urea cycle | 0.36 | 0.0258 |
3-Hydroxyisobutyrated | Valine metabolism | 0.40 | 0.0150 |
aMetabolites identified by factor analysis using z-score normalization are shown in bold. bCliff’s Delta d statistic. Positive values indicate increased concentrations in patients with an infection compared to no infectious disease.
cResult of Mann-Whitney U test.
dDifference in median concentrations confirmed after log transformation of the data improved homoscedasticity. P-value reported corresponds to test performed on log-transformed data.
eAssumption of equal variances not met. P-value reported corresponds to test performed on log-transformed data.
fTentatively assigned.