Table 4.
Multiple Regression Results Testing Predictive Validity of Three AUDIT Scoring Methods: Any 30 day binge drinking
| Cutoff | Sum Score | MNLFA Score | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Logistic Regression Results B (SE) |
Ordinary Least Squares Regression Results B (SE) |
Ordinary Least Squares Regression Results B (SE) |
|
| Intercept | −1.41 (.15) | −1.95 (.18) | −.79 (.22) |
| Female | −.90 (.07) | −.27 (.06) | −.17 (.08) |
| Black | −.45 (.14) | −.50 (.18) | −.44 (.22) |
| Hispanic | −.22 (.16) | −.25 (.20) | −.20 (.25) |
| White | −.25 (.15) | −.33 (.18) | −.03 (.23) |
| CARE | 1.02 (.12) | 1.32 (.16) | .73 (.16) |
| New Hope | −.49 (.25) | −.23 (.42) | −.57 (.32) |
| STT | .91 (.09) | .05 (.18) | .74 (.19) |
| Start Together | .99 (.15) | −.20 (.36) | −.01 (.41) |
| Stride | .07 (.23) | −.26 (.38) | −.27 (.42) |
| Success | 1.07 (.29) | −.15 (.69) | .39 (.64) |
| Vista | .63 (.18) | −1.18 (2.42) | −1.55 (.43) |
| AUDIT Score | 3.86 (.29) | .97 (.04) | 4.98 (.26) |
| AUDIT Score x CARE |
−.41 (.44) | −.58 (.06) | −3.40 (.29) |
| AUDIT Score x New Hope |
−.71 (1.01) | −.47 (.11) | −3.40 (.42) |
| AUDIT Score x STT |
.43 (.59) | .77 (.14) | 1.02 (.58) |
| AUDIT Scorex Start Together |
- | .96 (.33) | 1.72 (1.30) |
| AUDITScorex Stride |
1.43 (1.09) | .28 (.21) | −.10 (.90) |
| AUDITScore x Success |
- | .59 (.45) | .75 (1.87) |
| AUDIT Score x Vista |
- | .75 (.83) | 2.83 (1.01) |
Note. The BRIGHT study site was used as the comparison group in analyses because it had the largest sample size. Estimates for cells with dashes could not be obtained due to empirical underidentification. Bold parameters are significant at p<.05 but given that scores are on different metrics, values from the different regressions are not directly comparable. All effects are reported controlly for other reported variables in the model.