Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 26;10(1):103–110. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.12917

Table 2.

Oncogenic aberration and PD‐L1 expression in 130 consecutive NSCLC patients

PD‐L1 expression
Type of mutation PD‐L1 < 1%
(n = 42)
1% ≤ PD‐L1 < 50%
(n = 59)
PD‐L1 ≥ 50%
(n = 29)
P
EGFR, N (%)
Negative 26 (61.9) 45 (76.3) 26 (89.7) 0.051
0.031 §
Positive 16 (38.1) 14 (23.7) 3 (10.3)
Exon 19 deletion 5 (11.9) 6 (9.0) 2 (10.5)
Exon 21 L858R 7 (16.7) 4 (2.6) 0 (0.0)
Others 4 (9.5) 4 (0.7) 1 (5.3)
ALK, N (%)
Negative 41 (97.6) 55 (93.2) 27 (93.1) 0.652
0.427§
Positive 1 (2.4) 4 (6.8) 2 (6.9)
ROS1, N (%)
Negative 42 (100.0) 58 (98.3) 26 (89.7) 0.031
0.304§
Positive 0 (0.0) 1 (1.7) 3 (10.3)

P was evaluated by comparison with the wild type gene.

PD‐L1 < 50% versus PD‐L1 ≥ 50%.

§

PD‐L1 < 1% versus PD‐L1 ≥ 1%.

Values in bold are statistically significant.