Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Mar 26.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Chem Soc. 2018 Sep 17;140(38):12263–12269. doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b07865

Table 3.

Thermodynamic Data for the Binding of Q8 to MXA versus MXGGY and MXZGY Peptides

peptide Kd (μM)b ΔHb (kcal mol−1) TΔSc (kcal mol−1)
MYAa 0.25 (±0.01) −18.2 (±0.2) 9.3 (±0.1)
MYGGY 0.16 (±0.01) −19.4 (±0.4) 10.1 (± 0.4)
MLAa 0.72 (±0.09) −15.8 (±2.5) 7.4 (±2.5)
MLGGY 0.30 (±0.01) −16.9 (±0.1) 7.9 (±0.1)
LMAa 0.60 (±0.11) −12.1 (±0.2) 3.5 (±0.2)
LMGGY 0.16 (±0.02) −22.9 (±0.2) 13.5 (±0.3)
MKAa 2.6 (±0.4) −13.7 (±0.5) 6.0 (±0.6)
MKGGY 0.42 (±0.02) −16.9 (±0.1) 8.2 (±0.1)
MKAGY 0.89 (±0.07) −16.7 (±0.3) 8.3 (±0.4)
MKVGY 6.1 (±0.4) −15.9 (±0.5) 8.8 (±0.5)
a

Shown again for reference.

b

Mean values measured from at least three ITC experiments at 300 K in 10 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.0. Standard deviations are in parentheses.

c

Entropic contributions to the free energy of binding were calculated from the Kd and ΔH values, with error propagated from those of Kd and ΔH.