63 |
Piezoelectric MMG membranes |
Number of subjects not mentioned |
Muscle vibration / muscle contractions |
Sustained voluntary isometric contraction |
Power difference, MMG and EMG amplitude |
Power difference increased from 5% to 90% by rubbing skin. |
The EMG and MMG probe used in experiment was not standardized and it was tested only on sustained muscle contraction. |
64 |
Accelerometer |
10 men |
Isometric muscle contractions |
Isometric muscle contractions at 10%, 20%, and 40% MVC |
RMS and mean power spectral frequency (MPF) |
Variation in RMS and MPF with variation in sensor location. |
Effect of variation in MMG sensor location was studied only for voluntary contraction. |
60 |
Displacement sensor |
10 men |
Muscle stiffness |
Electrically evoked maximal single twitch |
Tc, Dm
|
No significant change in the Tc and Dm of BB muscle was observed after bed rest. |
Muscle stiffness assessment can be extended for voluntary contraction to have results closer to natural muscle condition |
66 |
Hybrid EMG / MMG probe |
15 women (9 with Parkinson disease, 6 healthy) |
Muscle stiffness and ability to carry load |
Submaximal load holding |
MMG Amplitude and MDF |
Higher RMS in agonist muscle and lower MDF in both agonist and antagonist muscles. |
Lack of normalization for EMG data. |
65 |
Hybrid EMG / MMG probe |
20 women (10 with Parkinson’s disease, 10 healthy) |
Tremor-related changes in Parkinson disease (PD) patients |
Maximal isometric contraction |
RMS, MDF for both PD patients and control subjects |
No intergroup difference in the assessed parameters was observed due to the medication. |
Maximal and submaximal load tasks were performed in different days which could alter the results of study |
62 |
Piezoelectric transducer |
20 (10 men, 10 women) |
Isometric contractions |
Muscle isometric ramp and step contractions |
MMG MPF, MMG total intensity, first and second principal components |
The MMG MPF and first principal component showed higher values in ramp contractions than in step contractions. |
Spectral properties of EMG and MMG signals can also be observed for other muscles. |
61 |
Piezoelectric transducer |
12 (6 men, 6 women) |
Contribution of BB to elbow flexion concentric / eccentric activity |
Voluntary concentric and eccentric contractions at 20%, 40%, 60%, and 80% load |
Elbow angle |
The total intensity of MMG during eccentric contractions was higher than that obtained during concentric contractions. |
Spectral properties of EMG and MMG signals can also be observed for other muscles and results may be compared to BB for generalization. |
59 |
Laser measurement device |
19 (gender not mentioned) |
Exercise hypertrophy & disuse atrophy |
Electrically evoked stimulation and then strength training by bicep curl to induce muscle hypertrophy |
Dm, Tc, Vc
|
Dm and Vc showed a decline on the same time points while Tc remained stable throughout the hypertrophic and atrophic phases. |
Using dominant limb as control may change the results of contractile properties, because motor unit activity has been observed to effect homologous contralateral limb. |
58 |
Microphone |
18 men |
Change in neuromuscular efficiency and muscle stiffness after eccentric contractions |
25 contractions at 50% MVC of elbow flexion |
MMG RMS and MDF |
MMG RMS decreased and the MMG MDF increased during the recovery period after contractions. |
Future work can be done on different intensity levels for muscle stiffness assessment. |
57 |
Piezoelectric accelerometer |
10 men |
Mechanical deformation of muscle |
Resting and ramp contraction from 5% to 85% MVC |
RMS correlation coefficient between the rest and contraction states, phase correlation coefficient |
High similarity in bulk movement between resting and contracting muscle was observed. |
Intensity variation in ramp contraction is not addressed in the study. |