Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 29;17(1):270–280. doi: 10.3892/ol.2018.9638

Table II.

Results of the Student's t-tests in the different AUC.b

Scenario Average AUC Difference



Normalized, min AUC from time, min AUC to time, min tTF-NGR Control Absolute Relative (%) P-valuea
8.3 8.3 30 2,085,311 2,203,500 118,190 5.7 0.0002
20 1,137,358 1,184,841   47,483 4.2 0.0001
15 664,323   683,336   19,013 2.9 0.0003
10 171,830   174,408   2,578 1.5 0.0024
9 9 30 2,028,616 2,095,892   67,276 3.3 0.0398
20 1,072,341 1,092,977   20,636 1.9 0.0997
15 595,217   599,203   3,986 0.7 0.2969
10 98,617   98,094   −522 −0.5 0.2732
10 10 30 1,947,814 2,016,251   68,437 3.5 0.0031
20 989,080 1,010,287   21,207 2.1 0.0054
15 510,565   515,004   4,439 0.9 0.0669
Max intensity Max intensity 30 2,086,301 2,207,055 120,755 5.8 0.0009
a

Student's t-test.

b

The AUC for different time periods were analysed (threshold α=1%). The average AUC values of the intensity curves of the two groups (tTF-NGR vs. control) differ significantly in the majority of cases, except for the cases where only very short time intervals were compared, e.g., the interval between 9 and 10 min. AUC, area under the curve; tTF, truncated tissue factor.