Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 24;17(1):623–629. doi: 10.3892/ol.2018.9614

Table IV.

Patient prognosis by cytokine genotypes.

Polymorphism Comparison groups Log-rank P Model Crude HR aHR-1 aHR-2
IL-1B C-31T (rs1143627) All 3 genotypes 0.916 Additive 1.03 0.89 0.74
(0.53–2.00) (0.39–2.03) (0.33–1.65)
vt. hetero+vt. homo vs. wt. homo 0.792 Dominant 1.16 1.02 0.93
(0.39–3.44) (0.29–3.54) (0.27–3.21)
vt. homo vs. others 0.889 Recessive 0.91 0.65 0.34
(0.25–3.30) (0.14–3.04) (0.06–1.83)
IL-1RN VNTRa All 3 genotypes <0.0001 Additive 8.29 8.28 8.88
(2.05–33.47) (2.05–33.51) (2.07–38.14)
vt. hetero+vt. homo vs. wt. homo 0.010 Dominant 6.83 6.61 8.84
(1.25–37.36) (1.19–36.71) (1.48–52.85)
vt. homo vs. others <0.0001 Recessive
IL-6 C-634G (rs1800796) All 3 genotypes 0.0005 Additive 2.61 2.71 3.05
(1.03–6.58) (0.99–7.40) (1.07–8.67)
vt. hetero+vt. homo vs. wt. homo 0.206 Dominant 1.96 1.92 1.97
(0.68–5.65) (0.64–5.73) (0.66–5.90)
vt. homo vs. others 0.0001 Recessive 13.31 15.01 39.15
(2.40–73.84) (2.22–101.41) (4.25–360.67)
IL-8 T-251A (rs4073) All 3 genotypes 0.869 Additive 0.84 0.77 0.97
(0.37–1.87) (0.34–1.77) (0.40–2.39)
vt. hetero+vt. homo vs. wt. homo 0.798 Dominant 0.87 0.83 0.94
(0.30–2.50) (0.29–2.43) (0.32–2.78)
vt. homo vs. others 0.601 Recessive 0.58 0.43 1.07
(0.08–4.49) (0.05–3.77) (0.11–10.23)
IL-10 T-819C (rs3021097) All 3 genotypes 0.541 Additive 1.10 1.07 1.06
(0.52–2.36) (0.49–2.34) (0.45–2.50)
vt. hetero+vt. homo vs. wt. homo 0.478 Dominant 1.49 1.50 1.24
(0.49–4.47) (0.48–4.66) (0.39–4.00)
vt. homo vs. others 0.578 Recessive 0.57 0.50 0.74
(0.07–4.34) (0.06–3.96) (0.09–5.87)
IL-10 A-1082G A/G vs. A/A 0.198 2.66 2.98 6.48
(rs1800896) (0.57–12.50) (0.60–14.73) (1.03–40.54)

HR, hazard ratio; aHR, adjusted hazard ratio (aHR-1, adjusted for sex and age; aHR-2, adjusted for age, sex and clinical stage [stage 4]).

a

For IL-1RN VNTR, L/L, L/2, and 2/2 genotypes were defined as wt. homo, vt. hetero and vt. homo, respectively, where L allele includes 5- and 6-repeat allele.