Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 30;6(4):96. doi: 10.3390/medsci6040096

Table 2.

Factors predicting outcome from spondylodiscitis.

Risk Factor Total (n = 91) Favourable Outcome (n = 29) Unfavourable Outcome 1 (n = 62) p-Value 2 Univariate Analysis
Background
Age (median (range)) 62.5 (17–91) 59 (17–90) 64 (35–91) 0.121
Diabetes mellitus (n (%)) 16 (18) 1 (3) 15 (24) 0.017 *
Immune compromise (n (%)) 18 (20) 3 (10) 15 (24) 0.162
Post-surgical (n (%)) 16 (18) 5 (17) 11 (18) >0.99
Presenting features
Sepsis (n (%)) 22 (24) 7 (24) 15 (24) >0.99
Frankel grading scale A–D (n (%)) 46 (51) 5 (17) 39 (63) <0.001 *
Duration of symptoms (median days (range)) 36 (1–203) 27 (1–71) 41 (2–203) 0.049 *
C-reactive protein (median mg/L (range)) 170 (4–508) 143 (15–395) 181 (4–508) 0.157
White blood cell count (median × 109 (range)) 13.1 (6.0–33.7) 12.2 (6.6–24.3) 13.6 (6.0–33.7) 0.18
Endocarditis 4 (4) 1 (3) 3 (5) >0.99
Radiological features
Epidural abscess (n (%)) 55 (60) 16 (55) 39 (63) 0.467
Multiple level discitis (n (%)) 27 (30) 6 (20) 21 (34) 0.228
Cord/cauda equina compression (n (%)) 32 (35) 5 (17.2) 27 (44) 0.018 *
Vertebral instability (n (%)) 12 (13) 2 (7) 10 (16) 0.325
Microbiological diagnosis
Bacteraemia (n (%)) 47 (52) 18 (62) 29 (47) 0.187
Staphylococcus aureus (n (%)) 35 (39) 10 (35) 25 (40) 0.649

1 Unfavourable outcome was defined as death, long-term physical disability or persistent pain requiring regular analgesia. 2 The significance of the differences between the groups with favourable and unfavourable outcomes was analysed using independent t-tests for continuous variables and Fisher’s exact testing for categorical variables. * indicates p < 0.05.