Table 5.
Two-way ANOVAS about the differences in father parenting practices according to the interaction between the role of involvement in cyberbullying and gender.
| Variable | Group | Sex | Mean | SD | N | F | F.D. | Sig. | Post Hoc | Cohen’s d |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Psychological control | NI | boys | 3.04 | 1.23 | 661 | 6.24 | (3, 1721) | 0.000 | NI ≠ NI
|
−0.23 |
| girls | 2.76 | 1.15 | 736 | NI ≠ B-VIC
|
0.58 | |||||
| VIC | boys | 3.42 | 1.25 | 60 | NI ≠ VIC
|
0.57 | ||||
| girls | 3.28 | 1.35 | 57 | NI ≠ AGGR
|
0.15 | |||||
| AGGR | boys | 2.93 | 1.15 | 53 | NI ≠ BVIC
|
0.44 | ||||
| girls | 3.75 | 1.20 | 18 | NI ≠ BVIC
|
0.86 | |||||
| B-VIC | boys | 3.27 | 1.14 | 108 | ||||||
| girls | 3.76 | 1.31 | 29 | |||||||
| Promotion of autonomy | NI | boys | 4.69 | 1.04 | 661 | 3.26 | (3, 1737) | 0.021 | NI ≠ VIC
|
−0.53 |
| girls | 4.83 | 1.04 | 749 | NI ≠ VIC
|
−0.67 | |||||
| VIC | boys | 4.12 | 1.27 | 56 | NI ≠ BVIC
|
−0.39 | ||||
| girls | 4.56 | 1.15 | 58 | NI ≠ BVIC
|
−0.64 | |||||
| AGGR | boys | 4.58 | 1.20 | 57 | ||||||
| girls | 4.15 | 1.12 | 19 | |||||||
| B-VIC | boys | 4.42 | 1.00 | 107 | ||||||
| girls | 4.14 | 1.53 | 31 |
Notes: NI = Non-involved; VIC = Cyber-victim; AGGR = Cyber-aggressor; B-VIC = Cyber-bully/Victim; F.D. = Freedom Degrees; SD = Standard Deviation.