Table 6.
Variables included in the regression equation for the different roles of cyber-bullying.
Dependent Variable | Predictors Variables | B | Odds Ratio | Sig. |
---|---|---|---|---|
Role of Cyber-victim | Mother’s affection and communication (GS) | −0.25 | 0.77 | 0.027 |
Father’s affection and communication (GS) | −0.27 | 0.76 | 0.010 | |
Mother’s affection and communication (B) | −0.47 | 0.62 | 0.000 | |
Father’s punishment (G) | 0.30 | 1.35 | 0.000 | |
Role of Cyber-aggressor | Father’s inductive discipline (GS) | 0.24 | 1.27 | 0.003 |
Father’s affection and communication (GS) | −0.42 | 0.65 | 0.000 | |
Father’s promotion of autonomy (B) | 0.59 | 1.80 | 0.015 | |
Father’s affection and communication (B) | −0.71 | 0.49 | 0.000 | |
Mother’s inductive discipline (G) | 0.68 | 1.97 | 0.000 | |
Father’s affection and communication (G) | −0.54 | 0.58 | 0.004 | |
Role of Cyber-bully/victim | Mother’s punishment (GS) | 0.16 | 1.17 | 0.029 |
Father’s supervision (GS) | 0.13 | 1.14 | 0.043 | |
Disclosure to mother (GS) | −0.24 | 0.78 | 0.004 | |
Father’s supervision (B) | 0.20 | 1.23 | 0.000 | |
Disclosure to father (B) | −0.26 | 0.76 | 0.004 | |
Mother’s punishment (G) | 0.47 | 1.6 | 0.000 | |
Role of non-involved | Father’s affection and communication (GS) | 0.39 | 1.48 | 0.000 |
Father’s inductive discipline (GS) | −0.12 | 0.88 | 0.016 | |
Mother’s punishment (GS) | −0.18 | 0.82 | 0.000 | |
Mother’s affection and communication (B) | 0.45 | 1.57 | 0.000 | |
Mother’s supervision (B) | −0.13 | 0.87 | 0.006 | |
Father’s affection and communication (G) | 0.32 | 1.84 | 0.002 | |
Mother’s punishment (G) | −0.16 | 0.84 | 0.074 | |
Mother’s response cost (G) | −0.24 | 0.78 | 0.004 |
Notes: GS = General sample; B = Boys; G = Girls; B = non-standardized coefficient.