Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 11;15(12):2819. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15122819

Table 1.

Summary of risk of bias assessment.

Articles Bias Within Studies Risk of Bias
Selection Performance Attrition Detection Reporting
Roberto et al., 2007 [48] + + + + + Low risk of bias
Morales et al., 2015 [49] + + + + Low risk of bias
Tortolero et al., 2010 [50] + + + + Low risk of bias
Cornelius et al., 2013 [51] + + + + Low risk of bias
Aronson et al., 2013 [52] + + + Moderate risk of bias
Calloway et al., 2013 [53] + + + Moderate risk of bias
Espada et al., 2012 [54] + + + Moderate risk of bias
Gaydos et al., 2008 [55] + + + Moderate risk of bias
Lemieux et al., 2008 [56] + + + Moderate risk of bias
Hlavinkova et al., 2014 [57] + + + Moderate risk of bias
Gold et al., 2010 [58] + + + Moderate risk of bias
Stanton et al., 2015 [59] + + + Moderate risk of bias
Ateka et al., 2007 [60] + + High risk of bias
O’Grady et al., 2009 [61] + + High risk of bias
Peskin et al., 2015 [62] + + High risk of bias
Mahat et al., 2008 [63] + + High risk of bias

For each bias: (+) = low risk and (−) = high risk or unclear risk. For within studies risk of bias: Low risk of bias = (+) for four or all types of bias. Moderate risk of bias = (+) for three types of bias. High risk of bias = for three or more types of bias.