Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 17;6(4):53. doi: 10.3390/proteomes6040053

Table 3.

Spinophilin interacting proteins that had altered abundance ratios in D1 Cre animals compared to A2A Cre animals.

Description PSMs Female A2A Ratios Female D1 Ratios Male D1 Avg Ratios Avg D1/A2A Ratios
Endophilin-A2 12 0.50 1.38 1.28 2.63
Cofilin-1 14 1.13 4.14 1.57 2.52
Malate dehydrogenase, mitochondrial 27 0.92 3.22 1.38 2.51
Calreticulin 8 0.87 3.15 1.11 2.46
Alpha-synuclein 21 1.06 3.56 1.61 2.43
Malate dehydrogenase, cytoplasmic 41 1.05 3.59 1.38 2.36
Glutamate dehydrogenase 1, mitochondrial 23 1.05 3.58 1.39 2.36
Fructose-bisphosphate aldolase 87 1.14 3.93 1.41 2.35
Protein disulfide-isomerase A3 9 0.93 3.19 1.13 2.31
Citrate synthase, mitochondrial 32 1.37 4.58 1.55 2.24
Synapsin-1 42 1.11 3.51 1.45 2.23
Tubulin polymerization-promoting protein 9 1.08 3.24 1.56 2.23
Nucleoside diphosphate kinase 12 1.20 3.92 1.39 2.21
Fascin 26 0.89 2.78 1.13 2.20
Cytochrome b-c1 complex subunit 1, mitochondrial 19 0.99 3.09 1.26 2.19
Carbonic anhydrase 2 14 1.22 3.75 1.54 2.18
Rab GDP dissociation inhibitor alpha 22 1.12 3.58 1.26 2.16
Protein kinase C and casein kinase substrate in neurons protein 1 18 1.10 3.36 1.30 2.12
Endophilin-A1 23 1.11 3.37 1.33 2.12
Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 5B, mitochondrial 13 1.17 3.52 1.43 2.12
Adenylyl cyclase-associated protein 2 8 1.43 4.36 1.63 2.09
Cytochrome b-c1 complex subunit 2, mitochondrial 40 1.04 3.08 1.22 2.06
Pyruvate kinase PKM 36 1.10 3.22 1.30 2.06
Profilin-2 14 1.33 3.85 1.58 2.04
Myelin proteolipid protein 38 1.58 4.56 1.89 2.04
60S ribosomal protein L17 8 1.06 3.20 1.12 2.03
40S ribosomal protein S23 11 0.89 2.40 1.23 2.03
Beta-synuclein 16 1.18 3.31 1.47 2.03
Heat shock 70 kDa protein 4 23 1.07 3.01 1.27 2.01
L-lactate dehydrogenase B chain 28 1.23 3.58 1.35 2.00

HA spinophilin was immunoprecipitated from saline and amphetamine-treated D1 Cre and A2A Cre mice. The abundance of the individual proteins was normalized to the abundance of spinophilin. A ratio of the abundance of proteins isolated from the amphetamine treated over the saline treated mice was generated. A second ratio comparing the amphetamine/saline ratios identified in the 3 D1 samples and the 1 A2A sample was generated. Those D1/A2A ratios ≥ 2.00 are shown. A complete list of interacting proteins (without contaminants) and the cell-specific abundance ratios are shown in Table S2B.