Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Brain Res. 2018 Nov 14;359:386–395. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2018.11.018

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Behavioral design (A) and mean percent freezing (± SEM) for the 3min post-shock (B) or 5min retention (C) freezing tests. (A) Animals were given alcohol or sham-intubation from PD4–9, and then run through the full three-day CPFE procedure from PD31–33. The US was two immediate shocks. (B) Animals in the SI-Pre group froze significantly higher than the EtOH-Pre group (p < .05), which froze significantly higher than both Alt-Pre groups during the post-shock freezing test (p < .05). (C) The SI-Pre group froze significantly higher than every other group during the retention freezing test (ps < .001), with no difference between the other groups (ps > .20). * indicates p < .05