Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Brain Res. 2018 Nov 14;359:386–395. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2018.11.018

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Behavioral design (A) and mean percent freezing (± SEM) for the 5min retention (B) freezing test occurring 24hrs after context-shock pairing. (A) Animals were given alcohol or sham-intubation from PD4–9, and then run through the two-day sCFC procedure from PD31–32. The US was two foot-shocks occurring three minutes after chamber entry. (B) There was no difference in retention test freezing between the SI-Delayed and the EtOH-Delayed groups (ps > .58), with both groups freezing significantly higher than an immediate-shock control group collapsed across dosing condition (ps < .001). * indicates p < .05