Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Auton Res. 2018 Mar 16;28(4):411–421. doi: 10.1007/s10286-018-0519-x

Table 3.

Comparison of different methods to assess gastric motility in humans

Diagnostic Test Advantages Disadvantages
Gamma camera scintigraphy Available for clinical use, allows direct measurement of gastric motility, non-invasive. Radiation exposure, prolonged study
Wireless pH and motility capsule Non-invasive, direct measurement of gastric and intestinal motility Limits patient’s activity, risk of capsule retention
Stable isotope breath tests Non-invasive measurement, applicable for children and pregnant women Lack of standardized meal
Magnetic resonance image Measures multiple parameters, assesses emptying fat and water separately Can be used in supine position, not commonly available, elevated cost, subject must hold breath during testing
Balloon measurement Gold standard for measurement of volume Needs intubation
SPECT Non-invasive, rate and volume measurement simultaneously Not widely available, only used in supine position
Manometry Records pressure of distal stomach, pylorus, and duodenum Invasive and painful
Acetaminophen intestinal absorption test Non-invasive, non-expensive Just for liquid phase of gastric emptying, need several blood draws