Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Occup Environ Med. 2019 Jan;61(1):21–28. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001463

Table 4.

Results for modification of the effect of marijuana use on involuntary job loss by household income, NESARC longitudinal (2001–2002/2003–2004) and cross-sectional (2012–2013) cohorts

Use in wave 1 and job loss in wave 2 (n=21,932), adjusted OR (95% CI)
Household Income
Past year marijuana use 0–9,999 20,000–34,999 35,000–69,999 ≥70,000
Any Use 1.46 (1.19, 1.80) 1.06 (0.88, 1.27) 1.18 (1.001, 1.39) 1.54 (1.20, 1.98)
No Use Ref Ref Ref Ref
Use and job loss in wave 3 (n=21,439), Adjusted OR (95% CI)
Any Use 1.36 (1.01, 1.82) 1.08 (0.76, 1.52) 1.38 (0.93, 2.05) 2.63 (1.76, 3.94)
No Use Ref Ref Ref Ref
Use in wave 1 and job loss in wave 2 (n=21,932), adjusted OR (95% CI)
Household Income
Frequency of use 0–19,999 20,000–34,999 35,000–69,999 ≥70,000
Daily 2. 36 (1.57, 3.54) 1.70 (1.07, 2.69) 2.47 (1.71, 3.59) 1.94 (1.05, 3.59)
Weekly 1.15 (0.85, 1.54) 0.87 (0.72, 1.05) 0.74 (0.67, 0.82) 0.23 (0.21, 0.25)
Monthly or less 1.19 (0.92, 1.54) 0.90 (0.74, 1.09) 0.91 (0.75, 1.11) 1.75 (1.32, 2.32)
No use Ref Ref Ref Ref
*

All analyses adjusted for race, sex, age, education, marital status, census region, general health, nativity, lifetime mental problems, lifetime alcohol disorder, lifetime other drug disorder, family history of drug disorder, government aid as child, trouble with boss and occupational class.