Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 11;10(12):702. doi: 10.3390/v10120702

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Proportion of potentially transmissible and nontransmisible cats based on proviral loads (pVLs) in different groups of feline foamy virus (FFV). The groups compared include monoinfected cats (FFV Mono), feline leukemia virus (FeLV) progressive (FeLV progressives) and regressive (FeLV regressives) cats in dual infection. In orange, the potentially FFV non-transmissible cats (undetectable buccal swab DNA). In blue, the FFV potentially transmissible cats (detectable DNA). Probabilities (p) were calculated using the Chi-square test.