Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 20;2018:9341846. doi: 10.1155/2018/9341846

Table 1.

Summary of demographic and clinical results.

Variable Result (mean ± SD)
Age (years) 36.9 ± 10.8
Gender, total (%)
Men 9 (60%)
Women 6 (40%)
Pterygium grade, total (%) (pterygia)
Grade I 9 (30%)
Grade II 18 (60%)
Grade III 3 (10%)
Pterygium morphology, total (%) (pterygia)
Atrophic 8 (26.7%)
Intermediate 14 (46.6%)
Fleshy 8 (26.7%)
Pterygium size (mm) 2 ± 0.7
Follow-up period (months) 16 ± 3.4
Operative time (minutes) 32 ± 4.1
Conjunctival defects/conjunctival grafts (mm2)∗∗
Nasal 7.9 ± 1.2
Temporal 6.5 ± 1.1
Total 13.6 ± 1.5
BCVA (logMAR)
Preoperative 0.64 ± 0.26
12-month follow–up 0.26 ± 0.18
Sim K astigmatism (diopters)
Preoperative 3.05 ± 1.5
12-month follow-up 1.15 ± 0.84
BUT (seconds)
Preoperative 9 ± 1.5
12-month follow-up 12.2 ± 2.3
Schirmer's test I (mm)
Preoperative 11.6 ± 5
12-month follow-up 13.6 ± 4.4
Recurrence, total (%) Zero (0%)
Cosmetic grading, total (%)
Grade 1 12 (80%)
Grade 2 3 (20%)
Postoperative complication, total (%)
Graft edema 7 pterygia (23%)
Subconjunctival hemorrhage 8 pterygia (23%)

Horizontal length of the pterygium from the limbus to the head (mm). ∗∗The size of conjunctival grafts equal to the size of conjunctival defects.