Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2018 Mar 6;18(5):505–513. doi: 10.1080/14712598.2018.1443442

Table 1.

Representative clinical studies using LSCs or their alternatives to treat LSCD.

Procedures Year Authors Type of
graft
Number of patients Success rate Improved visual acuity Follow up month
Mean/Median
[range]
Reference
CLAU 1989 Kenyon et al. Autograft 21 95% 81% Median 24
[6–45]
[30]
KLAL 2003 Holland et al. Allograft 31 74.2% 87.1% Mean 35.7
[12–117]
[62]
CLET (3T3-J2, fibrin) 2010 Rama et al. Autograft 107 68.2% 56.1% Mean 35
[12–120]
[64]
CLET (xeno-free, HAM) 2011 Sangwan et al. Autograft 200 71% 60.5% Mean 36
[12–91]
[65]
SLET 2016 Basu et al. Autograft 125 76% 75.2% Median 18
[12–48]
[68]
COMET 2011 Satake et al. Autograft 40 57.5% 59% Mean 25.5
[6–54.9]
[71]
EVCAU 2013 Ricardo et al. Autograft 12 83.3% 75% Mean 18.5
[15–26]
[43]
HHS Vulnerability Disclosure