Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 3;14(1):e0204378. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204378

Table 5. Performance of prediction and chemical similarities a,b.

Model Training 1 vs Test 1 Training 2 vs Test 2 Training 3 vs 75 A2A ligands Training 3 vs 56 drugs b
# of clusters in training 26 55 55 55
# of actives in training 53 35 97 97
# of inactives in training 88 48 171 171
Max similarity to test set c 0.65c 0.67 0.37 0.13
Sensitivity, % 82 96 78 72
Specificity, % 94 94 74 77

a Sensitivity = TP/(TP+FN), specificity = TN/(TN+FP), false positive rate = FP/(FP + TN), false negative rate = FN/(TP+FN), where TP is true positive, TN is true negative, FP is false positive, FN is false negative.

b Based on in vitro assay results, TP = 5, TN = 38, FP = 11, FN = 2.

c Similarities calculated using radial binary fingerprints. The 268 training and test compounds were represented by 55 centroid structures from the 55 chemical clusters.