Table 5. Performance of prediction and chemical similarities a,b.
Model | Training 1 vs Test 1 | Training 2 vs Test 2 | Training 3 vs 75 A2A ligands | Training 3 vs 56 drugs b |
---|---|---|---|---|
# of clusters in training | 26 | 55 | 55 | 55 |
# of actives in training | 53 | 35 | 97 | 97 |
# of inactives in training | 88 | 48 | 171 | 171 |
Max similarity to test set c | 0.65c | 0.67 | 0.37 | 0.13 |
Sensitivity, % | 82 | 96 | 78 | 72 |
Specificity, % | 94 | 94 | 74 | 77 |
a Sensitivity = TP/(TP+FN), specificity = TN/(TN+FP), false positive rate = FP/(FP + TN), false negative rate = FN/(TP+FN), where TP is true positive, TN is true negative, FP is false positive, FN is false negative.
b Based on in vitro assay results, TP = 5, TN = 38, FP = 11, FN = 2.
c Similarities calculated using radial binary fingerprints. The 268 training and test compounds were represented by 55 centroid structures from the 55 chemical clusters.