TABLE 2.
Method | nD = nD̄ | Estimate | Bias × 100 | Var × N | Coverage of 95% CI | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AUC = 0.7602 | ||||||
100 | 0.7258 | −3.4428 | 2.1767 | 2.4639 | 83.7% | |
250 | 0.7265 | −3.3782 | 2.1105 | 2.4791 | 65.8% | |
500 | 0.7264 | −3.3857 | 2.2695 | 2.4807 | 38.7% | |
100 | 0.7597 | −0.0564 | 2.0841 | 2.1019 | 95.1% | |
250 | 0.7604 | 0.0105 | 2.0643 | 2.0993 | 95.5% | |
500 | 0.7603 | 0.0057 | 2.2095 | 2.1025 | 94.3% | |
100 | 0.7600 | −0.0244 | 1.6382 | 1.6100 | 95.0% | |
250 | 0.7605 | 0.0223 | 1.6015 | 1.6149 | 94.9% | |
500 | 0.7603 | 0.0014 | 1.7089 | 1.6146 | 94.5% | |
pAUC(0,0.1) = 0.0244 | ||||||
100 | 0.0198 | −0.4535 | 0.0632 | 0.0685 | 95.0% | |
250 | 0.0203 | −0.4043 | 0.0663 | 0.0695 | 87.8% | |
500 | 0.0204 | −0.4002 | 0.0654 | 0.0701 | 75.5% | |
100 | 0.0230 | −0.1351 | 0.0688 | 0.0642 | 94.9% | |
250 | 0.0236 | −0.0721 | 0.0716 | 0.0681 | 94.8% | |
500 | 0.0238 | −0.0566 | 0.0711 | 0.0695 | 94.7% | |
100 | 0.0229 | −0.1464 | 0.0629 | 0.0613 | 95.4% | |
250 | 0.0236 | −0.0713 | 0.0630 | 0.0641 | 95.5% | |
500 | 0.0238 | −0.0591 | 0.0618 | 0.0656 | 95.5% | |
pAUC(0,0.2) = 0.0726 | ||||||
100 | 0.0619 | −1.0735 | 0.2692 | 0.2975 | 92.6% | |
250 | 0.0625 | −1.0053 | 0.2787 | 0.2990 | 81.2% | |
500 | 0.0626 | −0.9949 | 0.2785 | 0.3016 | 62.8% | |
100 | 0.0698 | −0.2757 | 0.2874 | 0.2728 | 94.5% | |
250 | 0.0711 | −0.1515 | 0.2899 | 0.2809 | 95.0% | |
500 | 0.0714 | −0.1212 | 0.2965 | 0.2841 | 94.6% | |
100 | 0.0696 | −0.2949 | 0.2489 | 0.2544 | 95.9% | |
250 | 0.0711 | −0.1496 | 0.2478 | 0.2615 | 95.8% | |
500 | 0.0713 | −0.1253 | 0.2459 | 0.2634 | 95.5% |