Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Invest Radiol. 2018 Dec;53(12):742–747. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000499

Table 1 –

Lesion detection rate, accuracy and measurement precision for 3 independent board-certified radiologists using either conventional or compressed sensing T2 SPACE for IAC screening protocols.

Rater Lesion detectiona Accuracy Lesion size measurement (mm)b
SPACE CS SPACE SPACE CS SPACE SPACE CS SPACE
1 26.7% (20/75)c 26.3% (20/76) 100% (75/75) 100% (76/76) 13.8 ± 7.6 13.1 ± 7.2d
2 26.3% (20/76) 26.3% (20/76) 100% (76/76) 100% (76/76) 12.9 ± 7.3 13.1 ± 7.0
3 26.3% (20/76) 25.0% (19/76) 100% (76/76) 98.7% (75/76) 13.8 ± 6.7 14.3 ± 7.4
a

Reference standard was the postcontrast T1-weighted MRI (unavailable to radiologist raters at time of review).

b

The maximum dimension of detected lesions in the axial plane measured by individual raters.

c

Missing datapoint (note, there were 455 total assessments for lesion detection).

d

P = 0.048 using paired-sample Wilcoxon signed rank test, whereas measurements from raters 2 and 3 demonstrated no difference between the two sequences.