Table 2.
Moderated mediation results for all three outcomes, Study 1
| Coefficient | p | |
|---|---|---|
| (a) Speaking time | ||
| Role Model Posture (Predictor) | −7.97 | .52 |
| Role Model Gender (Moderator) | ||
| Participants’ body posture openness (Mediator) | 41.92 | .001 |
| Role Model Posture x Gender | ||
| IVET realness (Control) | −6.11 | .31 |
| Constant | 64.33 | .05 |
|
R2 = .11 F (3, 82) = 3.44, p = .02 |
||
| (b) External evaluation of speech performance: audio and video | ||
| Role Model Posture (Predictor) | .04 | .82 |
| Role Model Gender (Moderator) | ||
| Participants’ body posture openness (Mediator) | .78 | .0001 |
| Role Model Posture x Gender | ||
| IVET realness (Control) | −.10 | .28 |
| Constant | .76 | .14 |
|
R2 = .22 F (3, 82) = 7.83, p = .0001 |
||
| (c) External evaluation of speech performance: audio only | ||
| Role Model Posture (Predictor) | .07 | .68 |
| Role Model Gender (Moderator) | ||
| Participants’ body posture openness (Mediator) | .40 | .01 |
| Role Model Posture x Gender | ||
| IVET realness (Control) | −.09 | .25 |
| Constant | 2.17 | .0001 |
|
R2 = .11 F (3, 82) = 3.44, p = .02 |
||
Role Model Posture: 0 = closed; 1 = open; Role Model Gender: 0 = male; 1 = female