Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. 2018 Nov 27;14(1):59–71. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsy106

Table 2.

Effect of tDCS on percentage of choices consistent with private signal in different NPI

NPI	Stimulation (M ± SEM)			Post hoc tests
NPI	1: Anodal	2: Sham	3: Cathodal	Post hoc tests
−5	0.359 ± 0.055	0.125 ± 0.055	0.109 ± 0.055	1 and 2^, 1–3^* and 2 and 3
−3	0.359 ± 0.060	0.188 ± 0.060	0.141 ± 0.060	1 and 2^, 1–3^* and 2 and 3
−1	0.719 ± 0.064	0.609 ± 0.064	0.563 ± 0.064	1 and 2, 1–3 and 2 and 3
5	0.969 ± 0.022	1 ± 0.022	0.969 ± 0.022	1 and 2, 1–3 and 2 and 3
3	0.938 ± 0.026	0.969 ± 0.026	0.984 ± 0.026	1 and 2, 1–3 and 2 and 3
1	0.953 ± 0.025	0.984 ± 0.025	0.969 ± 0.025	1 and 2, 1–3 and 2 and 3

^*P < 0.10; ^**P < 0.05; ^***P < 0.01.