Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 27;14(1):59–71. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsy106

Table 3.

Effect of tDCS on RT in different NPI

NPI Stimulation [M ± SEM (seconds)] Post hoc tests
1: Anodal 2: Sham 3: Cathodal
−5 1.765 ± 0.292 2 ± 0.308 2.171 ± 0.323 1 and 2, 1–3 and 2 and 3
−3 1.968 ± 0.319 2.812 ± 0.353 3.046 ± 0.421 1 and 2*, 1–3** and 2 and 3
−1 2.781 ± 0.364 3.609 ± 0.446 4.593 ± 0.468 1 and 2*, 1–3*** and 2 and 3
5 0.484 ± 0.122 0.422 ± 0.121 0.422 ± 0.169 1 and 2, 1–3 and 2 and 3
3 0.937 ± 0.199 0.906 ± 0.238 0.796 ± 0.210 1 and 2, 1–3 and 2 and 3
1 0.813 ± 0.143 1.125 ± 0.270 1.609 ± 0.356 1 and 2, 1–3 and 2 and 3

*P < 0.10; **P < 0.05; ***P < 0.01.