Table 2.
Results from validation of microbiological assessment
| Micro-organism | Agar type | Test solution cfu | Positive control cfu (c) | Lower limit (c÷2) | Higher limit (c×2) | Pass/Fail* |
| Aspergillus brasiliensis | TSA | 37 | 23 | 12 | 46 | Pass |
| A. brasiliensis | SDX | 50 | 47 | 24 | 94 | Pass |
| Escherichia coli | TSA | 34 | 24 | 12 | 48 | Pass |
| Bacillus subtilis | TSA | 50 | 37 | 19 | 74 | Pass |
| Candida albicans | TSA | 38 | 32 | 16 | 64 | Pass |
| C. albicans | SDX | 42 | 39 | 20 | 78 | Pass |
| Staphylococcus aureus | TSA | 38 | 53 | 27 | 106 | Pass |
| Pseudomonas aeruginosa | TSA | 41 | 36 | 18 | 72 | Pass |
*Validation passes if the number of colonies from the test solution does not differ by a factor greater than 2 from the number of colonies from the positive control solution.
Notes: Negative controls and environmental monitoring comply.
The system has been shown to be suitable when (1) between 10 and 100 cfu of each type of micro-organism are present in the positive controls; (2) there is no interfering growth in the sample; (3) there is no growth on the negative control; and (4) there is no growth on the settle plate.
cfu, colony-forming units; TSA, tryptone soya agar; SDX, sabouraud dextrose agar.