Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 29;91(1092):20180507. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20180507

Table 2.

Overall diagnostic performance of ultrasound and MRI features for diagnosis of nodal metastases

Variables Cut-off Value AUC (95% CI) p-value
Ultrasound (n = 316)
 CTRa >2.3 mm 0.635 (0.579 to 0.688) <.001
 CTDa >2.3 mm 0.642 (0.586 to 0.694) <.001
 CT-bilateral differenceRb >0.7 mm 0.656 (0.601 to 0.709) <.001
 CT-bilateral differenceDb >0.7 mm 0.662 (0.607 to 0.714) <.001
 LD ≤13 mm 0.542 (0.486 to 0.598) .234
 SD >4.5 mm 0.532 (0.475 to 0.588) .380
 LD/SD ≤1.7 0.557 (0.501 to 0.613) .110
 Eccentricity N/A 0.565 (0.508 to 0.620) .010
 Fatty hilum loss N/A 0.548 (0.491 to 0.604) .003
 Irregularity N/A 0.512 (0.456 to 0.569) .442
MRI (n = 260)
 CTRa >3.0 mm 0.622 (0.560 to 0.681) .004
 CTDa >3.0 mm 0.632 (0.570 to 0.690) .002
 CT-bilateral differenceRb >0.8 mm 0.647 (0.586 to 0.705) <.001
 CT-bilateral differenceDb >0.8 mm 0.651 (0.589 to 0.708) <.001
 LD >10 mm 0.560 (0.497 to 0.621) .132
 SD >5.9 mm 0.588 (0.526 to 0.649) .032
 LD/SD ≤2.8 0.533 (0.470 to 0.595) .412
 Eccentricity N/A 0.587 (0.525 to 0.648) .003
 Fatty hilum loss N/A 0.532 (0.469 to 0.594) .131
 Irregularity N/A 0.527 (0.465 to 0.589) .171

AUC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; CT, cortical thickness; LD, long diameter; SD, short diameter.

a

If the ALN had loss of fatty hilum, two CT features were assessed: radius (CTR) or SD (CTD).

b

CT-bilateral differenceR was calculated by CTR minus CT of contralateral ALN and CT-bilateral differenceD by CTD minus CT of contralateral ALN.