Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jan 4.
Published in final edited form as: Crit Public Health. 2018 Feb 20;29(1):27–39. doi: 10.1080/09581596.2018.1434482

Table 2.

Comparison of outcomes measures for pre/post-data analysis by study arm and within study arm among 490 AIAN community members.

Pre-training score Post-training score Difference Test statistic
Research review efficacy
Total score 413 2.99 (1.01) 3.94 (.72) .95 t = 19.6***
Difference in AIAN curriculum group 218 3.04 (1.04) 4.02 (.63) .98 t = 14.7***
Difference in CITI curriculum group 195 2.93 (.98) 3.85 (.79) .91 t = 12.9***
Trust in research
Total score 414 3.15 (.39) 3.23 (.38) .07 t = 3.62***
Difference in AIAN curriculum group 218 3.11 (.39) 3.22 (.36) .11 t = 3.9***
Difference in CITI curriculum group 196 3.20 (.38) 3.23 (.39) .03 t = 1.08
Interest in research
Total score 414 4.35 (.62) 4.22 (.75) .13 t = 4.08***
Difference in AIAN curriculum group 218 4.40 (.55) 4.31 (.67) .1 t = 2.45**
Difference in CITI curriculum group 196 4.29 (.68) 4.12 (.82) .17 t = 3.27***
*

P < .05;

**

P < .01;

***

P < .001;

t = t test.