Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 23;3(1):235–249. doi: 10.1210/js.2018-00317

Table 1.

Deconvolution Analysis of the LH and T Profiles During 7.5 H of Continuous and Pulsatile T Infusions

Continuous T Pulsatile T P Value
LH
 Pulse frequency, no./7.5 h 3.6 ± 0.34 3.3 ± 0.23 0.32
 Fast half- life, min 6.93 6.93 1.0
 Long half- life, min 57 ± 4.4 62 ± 4.3 0.38
 Mode, min 13 ± 0.7 13 ± 0.9 0.94
 Basal secretion, IU/L/7.5 h 29.2 ± 3.9 28.9 ± 5.6 0.95
 Pulsatile secretion, IU/L/7.5 h 25.6 ± 2.3 23.3 ± 2.4 0.39
 Total secretion, U/L/7.5 h 54.8 ± 5.8 52.2 ± 7.1 0.62
 Mean pulse mass, U/L 7.7 ± 0.8 7.4 ± 0.8 0.76
T
 Pulse frequency, no./7.5 h 5.4 ± 0.4 6.2 ± 0.4 0.26
 Fast half- life, min 1.4 1.4 1.0
 Long half- life, min 18.5 ± 1.1 15.0 ± 0.4 0.016
 Mode, min 11.9 ± 1.5 13.1 ± 1.6 0.64
 Basal secretion, IU/L/7.5 h 7070 ± 500 9050 ± 550 0.002
 Pulsatile secretion, IU/L/7.5 h 530 ± 54 1020 ± 160 0.008
 Total secretion, U/L/7.5 h 7600 ± 520 10,070 ± 630 0.001
 Mean pulse mass, U/L 99 ± 8.2 162 ± 18.5 0.003

Data are shown as means ± SEM. Statistical comparison between the two groups was done with the two-tailed Student t test for paired data. P < 0.01 was considered significant.