Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 6;29(1):3–14. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3525-0

Table 6.

Meta-analysis pooled effect sized (%EWL), heterogeneity and publication bias

Operation Studies (N) Patients at follow-up Pooled effect size (95% CI) Q I 2 (%) Egger’s regression intercept
RYGB 9 1326 60.05 (54.74, 65.37) 105.63* 92.43 − 3.33, p = .575
LAGB 13 485 48.84 (42.75, 54.93) 80.79* 85.15 − 1.31, p = .262
BPD/DS 7 393 71.00 (62.33, 79.67) 108.63* 94.48 − 3.33, p = .575
Gastroplasty 4 448 53.54 (45.78, 61.30) 39.01* 92.31 − 5.13, p = .492

*p < .001