Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 10;116(1):106–115. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1806617115

Table 5.

Estimates of test size, P, and FPR using modified procedures 15 and 16, with T*=10,000, for different values of nt and for mt=1

Uniform contamination (Eq. 12) Dirac-type contamination (Eq. 13)
τt=0 τt=0.5 τt=0.8 τt=0.5 τt=0.8
No. of transactions Test α^ P FPR P FPR P FPR P FPR
nt=100 V{1}(t) 0.071 0.414 0.716 0.928 0.600 1 0.579 1 0.572
Test 15 0.010 0.000 1 0.000 1 0.850 0.167 1 0.180
Test 16 0.011 0.350 0.329 0.864 0.179 0.990 0.161 1 0.144
nt=200 V{1}(t) 0.094 0.812 0.683 1 0.630 1 0.648 1 0.634
Test 15 0.010 0.000 1 0.000 1 0.878 0.157 1 0.187
Test 16 0.012 0.678 0.213 0.934 0.182 0.998 0.153 0.992 0.175
nt=500 V{1}(t) 0.132 1 0.719 1 0.714 1 0.708 1 0.717
Test 15 0.010 0.004 0.983 0.000 1 0.776 0.173 1 0.154
Test 16 0.010 0.894 0.189 0.938 0.149 0.996 0.171 1 0.143

The estimated test sizes for V{1}(t) are also given as a reference. The nominal test size is α=0.01. The number of independent idealized traders in each market configuration is T=85,500 for procedure 15 and T=10,000 for procedure 16, P and FPR. ς=0.05 when computing P and FPR