Table 1. Baseline characteristics of 117 case managers in outcomes analysis, by intervention group.

Characteristic	Overall (N=117)		RS (N=59)		CEP (N=58)		Test
	No.	%	No.	%	No.	%	χ2	df	p
Healthcare screening sector (vs. community sector)	69	62	40	70	29	54	.9	1	.343
Non-licensed	87	73	45	76	42	70	.17	1	.676
Age (M±SD)	43.6 ± 1.6		43.4 ± 2.5		43.7 ± 2.1		.01	1	.922
Female sex	82	71	38	65	44	76	.97	1	.325
Race							.36	3	.948
Hispanic	55	47	26	45	29	49
Black or African American	52	45	27	46	25	45
Non-Hispanic white	7	6	4	7	3	5
Other (API/Native/other)	3	2	2	3	1	2
Some college or above	105	90	53	90	52	90	0	1	.985
Depression care techniquesb (M±SD)	2.6 ± .1		2.5 ± .2		2.7 ± .2		.38	1	.537
Depression case managementb (M±SD)	2.5 ± .1		2.6 ± .2		2.5 ± .2		.46	1	.499
Community services provisionc (M±SD)	1.4 ± .2		1.1 ± .2		1.6 ± .3		3.07	1	.08
Perception of depression knowledged (M±SD)	2.1 ± .1		2 ± .1		2.1 ± .1		.45	1	.502
Perception of depression skille (M±SD)	2.2 ± .1		2.3 ± .1		2.2 ± .1		.39	1	.533
Personal depression stigmaf, (M±SD)	3.8 ± .1		3.7 ± .1		4.0 ± .1		5.17	1	.023
Number of system barriersg (M±SD)	.8 ± .1		.9 ± .2		.7 ± .2		.3	1	.582

^aData were multiply imputed and weighted for attrition to present eligible sample; Chi-square test was used for a comparison between the two groups accounting for the design effect of the cluster randomization. Percentages may not add to 100% because of rounding.

^bPossible scores range from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater use depression care techniques.

^cPossible scores range from 0 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater hours providing services.

^dPossible scores range from 1 to 5, with lower scores indicating greater depression knowledge.

^ePossible scores range from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater perception of skills.

^fPossible scores range from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating less depression stigma.

^gPossible scores range from 0 to 4, with lower scores indicating fewer number of barriers from a list of 4.