Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 7;23(12):3244. doi: 10.3390/molecules23123244

Table 2.

Effects of different antioxidant compounds on LOX/RNO and LOX–FL reactions.

Compound Ki a or IC50 b Antioxidant/Trolox c
LOX/RNO Reaction
Trolox 7.0 ± 1.1 mM a,d 1.00
Resveratrol 1.7 ± 0.2 mM a,d 4.57 ± 0.33 e
Ferulic acid 10.7 ± 2.1 mM a,d 0.99 ± 0.11e
Gallic acid 6.7 ± 1.3 mM a,d 0.61 ± 0.05 e
Apigenin 3.4 ± 0.5 mM a,d 1.49 ± 0.09 e
Catechin 13.6 ± 1.8 mM a,d 0.42 ± 0.03 e
l-Ascorbic acid 14.0 ± 1.9 mM a,d 0.83 ± 0.09 e
Glutathione 19.7 ± 3.2 mM b,d n.d.
α-tocopherol 1.1 ± 0.1 mM a,d 3.43 ± 0.25 e
β-carotene 7.8 ± 0.9 μM b,d n.d.
LOX–FL Reaction
Trolox 5 ± 0.6 μM a; 26 ± 2 μM b,d 1.00
Albumin 25 ± 2 μM b,d 1.04 ± 0.08 e,f
Bilirubin 7.6 ± 0.6 μM b,d 3.43 ± 0.28 e,f
l-Ascorbic acid 1360 ± 10 μM b,d 0.02 ± 0.002 e,f
Uric acid 40 ± 2 μM b,d 0.66 ± 0.04 e,f

a Ki values were obtained by measuring reaction rates at different RNO or FL and antioxidant concentrations; b IC50 values represent the antioxidant concentration able to make half the rates of LOX/RNO (or LOX-mediated oxodiene generation in the case of glutathione) or LOX–FL reactions; c ratio between the gradient of the plot reporting the decrease of the rate (%) of LOX/RNO or LOX–FL reaction as a function of the antioxidant concentration and the gradient of the same plot relative to Trolox; d mean value ± standard deviation (n = 4); e mean value ± standard error (n = 4); f unpublished data; n.d. = not determined. Adapted from Pastore et al. [25] and Soccio et al. [26].