Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jan 7.
Published in final edited form as: Support Care Cancer. 2016 Jun 29;24(11):4769–4777. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3328-6

Table 5.

Comparison of Caregiver and Care Recipient Ratings on Oral Problem Scale Items (N=104)

Scale Item CG > CR CG = CR CG < CR p Valuea
Xerostomia Thirst frequency 31% 35% 34% .63
Dry lips frequency 20% 32% 49% <.01
Dry mouth frequency 26% 32% 42% .06
Average severity of dryness (0-10) 29% 29% 42% .13
Orofacial pain Facial pain frequency 23% 62% 15% .25
Intraoral pain frequency 24% 47% 29% .43
Frequency of mouth sores 16% 71% 13% .63
Sharp or shooting facial/intraoral pain frequency 21% 66% 13% .13
Average pain severity (0-10) 33% 40% 27% .41
Taste change Frequency of taste change 30% 37% 33% .67
Functional impact Frequency of swallowing difficulty 27% 47% 26% .83
Frequency of speaking difficulty 25% 47% 28% .67
Frequency of eating difficulty 37% 39% 24% .11
Frequency of food restriction 32% 45% 23% .27
From dryness (0-10) 29% 34% 36% .38
From pain (0-10) 32% 40% 28% .62
Social impact Worried frequency 31% 48% 20% .13
Bothered frequency 36% 41% 23% .09
Frequency of not wanting people around you 26% 64% 10% .01
Life less satisfying frequency 22% 58% 20% .67

Caregiver and Care Recipient Ratings on Oral Problem Subscales (N = 104)

Subscale Mean ± SD p value

Care Recipient Care Giver
Xerostomia 5.8 ± 2.5 5.1 ± 2.4 <.01
Orofacial pain 1.8 ± 2.1 1.9 ± 2.0 .57
Taste change 4.4 ± 3.6 4.3 ± 3.5 .74
Function impact 2.8 ± 2.2 2.9 ± 2.2 .80
Social impact 2.0 ± 2.2 2.5 ± 2.5 .02

CG = Caregiver, CR = Care recipient.

a

The p value was obtained by regression of the sign of CG-CR against a constant. It indicated whether there is significant under- or over-estimation in caregiver ratings.