Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 14;34(1):63–73. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfx378

Table 4.

Case–control comparison with EUVAS trials

CycLowVas cases EUVAS controls P-value
n 66 198
Baseline features
 Female:male, n (%) 28:38 (42:58) 78:120 (40:60) 0.66
 Age (years) median (range) 63 (54.2–73) 63 (53.25–71) 0.75
 MPO:PR3 ANCA, n (%) 33:33 (50:50) 99:99 (50:50) 1.00
 Baseline eGFR (mL/min), median (range) 25.5 (18–43.7) 27.1 (16.2–40.6) 0.45
 Baseline BVAS, median (range) 18.5 (15–21.75) 18.5 (13–23.75) 0.77
Unadjusted outcomes at 6 months
 Remission at 6 months, n (%) 62/66 (96) 141/151 (93.7) 0.88
 6-month eGFR (mL/min), median (range) 49 (37.5–67) 45.7 (31.8–62.23) 0.14
 6-month ΔeGFR (mL/min), median (range) 13 (1.5–27.5) 11.3 (1.5–24.15) 0.30
 Cyclophosphamide dose (g), median (range) 3 (3–3.5) 13.5 (8.6–22.5) <0.001
 Total corticosteroid dose (g), median (range) 4.2 (1.0–6.5) 5.3 (1.1–9.3) <0.001
Unadjusted long-term outcomes, n (%)
 Relapse 14/66 (21) 61/198 (30.8) 0.18
 Relapse PR3-ANCA 5/33 (15) 42/99 (42) 0.008
 Relapse MPO-ANCA 9/33 (27) 19/99 (19) 0.46
 ESRD 4/66 (6) 28/198 (14) 0.12
 Death 9/66 (13.6) 46/198 (23.2) 0.13
Follow-up (days) median (range) 1716 (964–2598) 1878 (999–2946)