Table 1.

Quantitative comparison between different manual segmentation and the proposed segmentation method

Dice ±  CV(%) value	LV endocardium	LV epicardium	RV
Reader 1	98.26 ± 1.92	97.23 ± 2.56	95.66 ± 2.35
Reader 2	98.37 ± 1.78	97.47 ± 2.21	97.78 ± 2.30
Reader 3	97.64 ± 2.51	97.22 ± 2.70	95.31 ± 3.17
Proposed method	88.62 ± 5.47	87.35 ± 7.26	82.63 ± 6.22