Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 28;8(3):439–452. doi: 10.1159/000493749

Table 5.

Results from the binary logistic regression analysis predicting patients with good verbal memory and nonpathological AB42 vs. poor verbal memory and pathological AB42

Variable Model 1 (unadjusted)
(n = 166–170)
Model 2
(n =170)
Model 3
(n =164)
Gender 0.75 (0.40–1.42) 0.77 (0.39–1.53) 1.19 (0.48–2.85)
Age 1.13 (1.07–1.19) 1.12 (1.07–1.18) 1.10 (1.04–1.16)
Education 0.93 (0.84–1.02) 0.97 (0.88–1.08) 0.88 (0.78–1.00)
Sleep problems 0.29 (0.15–0.57) 0.25 (0.10–0.58)
Much to do 0.57 (0.43–0.75) 0.64 (0.47–0.88)
Negative stress 0.70 (0.54–0.89) NAa
Control 1.43 (0.99–2.08) 1.07 (0.67–1.72)

Values are presented as OR (95% CI).

a

Variable was removed from model 3 due to a high correlation with “much to do.”