Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 24;2018:9014726. doi: 10.1155/2018/9014726

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of clinical trials included in the analysis of combinations for the treatment of tegumentary leishmaniasis.

Study source Area, Country Study design Period of study Age range, mean (years) Gender Clinical form Patients enrolled Leishmaniasis diagnosis Statistics
Almeida et al., 2005 Bahia, Brazil Open-label
clinical trial
NR 14-25, 18 Male 60%
Female 40%
Cutaneous 5 Clinical and Laboratory (skin test, and isolation in culture) No

Arevalo et al., 2007 Lima, Peru Comparative study;
Randomized Controlled Trial
8/2005–10/2005 18-87, 34.9 Male 55%
Female 45%
Cutaneous 20 Clinical and Laboratory (microscopy, culture, and/or PCR, and Montenegro skin test) Yes

Brito et al., 2017 Bahia, Brazil Randomized -controlled trial 12/2010–10/2013 18-62 Predominance
of male
Cutaneous 162 Clinical and laboratorial (Leishmania skin test, and/or histopathology, culture and PCR) Yes

El-Sayed & Anwar, 2010 Sanaa, Yemen Comparative study;
Randomized Controlled Trial
6/2006–6/2007 12-50, 23.5 Male 53.3%
Female 46.7%
Cutaneous 30 Clinical and Laboratory (smear for amastigote and tissue culture) Yes

Farajzafeh et al., 2015 Iran Randomized clinical trial 2011-2012 2-60, 18.52 Male 34
Female 36
NR 10
Cutaneous 80 Laboratory (smear microscopy) Yes

Firooz et al., 2006 Razavi, Iran Multicenter Study;
Randomized Controlled Trial
8/2004-/2005 12-60, 27.0 Male 44.5%
Female 55.5%
Cutaneous 119 Laboratory (smear or culture) Yes

Khatami et al., 2013 Kashan, Iran  Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial 9/200–4/2010 12-60, 28.8 Male 47%
Female 53%
Cutaneous 83 Laboratory (smear or culture) Yes

Llanos Cuentas et al., 2010 Cusco, Peru Randomized Controlled Trial 8/2004 – 6/2005 18-59 Male 96%
Female 4%
Mucosal 48 Laboratory (microscopy, PCR or in vitro culture) Yes

Machado et al., 2007 Bahia, Brazil Randomized Controlled Trial NR 18-65 Male 83%
Female 17%
Mucosal 23 Laboratory (Intradermal skin test, parasite isolation by culture, and/or histopathological) Yes

Meymandi et al., 2011 Kerman, Iran Comparative Study;
Randomized Controlled Trial
11/2007-8/2009 7-60 Male 46.6%
Female 53.4%
Cutaneous 191 Laboratory (smear or skin biopsy) Yes

Miranda-Verastegui et al., 2005 Lima, Peru  Randomized Controlled Trial 2/2001 – 8/2002 1-78 Male 57.5%
Female 42.5%
Cutaneous 40 Laboratory (aspiration, smear, biopsy, culture, and/or PCR) Yes

Miranda-Verastegui et al., 2009 Lima and Cusco, Peru Comparative Study;
Randomized Controlled Trial
12/2005-6/2006 4-52 Male 77.5%
Female 22.5%
Cutaneous 80 Laboratory (smear microscopy, culture or PCR) Yes

Nascimento et al., 2010 Minas Gerais, Brazil Randomized Controlled Trial 10/2004–10/2006 18-59, 26.4 Male 63.6%
Female 36.4%
Cutaneous 44 Laboratory (microscopy identification in biopsied tissue) Yes

Nilforoushzadeh et al., 2007 Isfahan, Iran  Randomized Controlled Trial NR 7-70 Male 67.7%
Female 32.3%
Cutaneous 90 Laboratory (smear microscopy) Yes

Nilforoushzadeh et al., 2008 Tehran, Iran Comparative Study; Randomized Controlled Trial NR 7-70 Male 71.0%
Female 29.0%
Cutaneous 124 Laboratory (smear microscopy) Yes

Van Thiel et al., 2010 Northern Afghanistan, Clinical Trial 6/2005-11/2005 NR Dutch
Troops
Cutaneous 163 Laboratory (smear microscopy, culture, and PCR) Yes

NR, not reported; PCR, polymerase chain reaction.