Skip to main content
. 2017 May 11;38(8):3823–3835. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23631

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Edge correlations across subjects. To investigate whether the star hyperedges displayed higher cohesiveness among edges than well‐known cognitive systems or network modules, we compared the star hyperedges and 13 predefined modules [Power et al., 2011] with the null hypothesis that the pairwise similarity of edges in star hyperedges was no higher than that of the edges within the modules. Except for the two smallest systems (the cerebellum and memory retrieval), all other null hypotheses were rejected with the FDR‐corrected q<0.001. Results emphasize the higher level of coherence present in star hyperedges than in traditional node‐based network modules. [Color figure can be viewed at http://wileyonlinelibrary.com]