Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 7;19:4. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0646-z

Table 3.

Quantifying treatment contamination where treatment receipt was defined as binary

Reference Control treatment Active intervention Measure of contamination Contamination (control participants receiving intervention)
Aveyard et al. [40] Basic behavioural support for smoking cessation Behavioural support for smoking cessation Nurse visit (1st extra);
Telephone call;
Nurse visit (2nd extra)
12/469 (3%)
12/469 (3%)
5/469 (1%)
Barton et al. [41] No treatment Mammography education (pamphlet and videotape) focusing on anxiety Patient recall of:
Pamphlet;
Videotape
9%
1%
Bernstein et al. [42] No treatment Cognitive behavioural therapy Service Questionnaire of anxiety treatment 0/24 (0%)
Borland et al. [43] Minimal information Behavioural support Patients reporting use of extensive behavioural support 45/378 (12%)
Clarkson et al. [36] Routine care Self-efficacy education Participants reporting use of electric toothbrush 9/113 (8%)p
9/180 (5%)c
Courneya et al. [44] Group psychotherapy Group psychotherapy and exercise programme Patient-reported exercise 10/45 (22%)
Dilley et al. [45] Usual care Cognitive counselling Patient-reported receipt of counselling 45/158 (29%)
Forchuk et al. [46] Usual care Transitional discharge from hospital Patient-reported receipt of peer support and staff contact 27%
Heirich & Sieck [47] Health education Proactive follow-up counselling Patients requesting personal counselling 56%
Johnson et al. [20] Usual treatment Clinical training in dual diagnosis of psychosis and substance misuse Patients not taken on by trained case manager 19/105 (18%)
Khumalo-Sakutukwa et al. [48] Standard HIV voluntary counselling and testing HIV counselling, testing and self-management Participants seeking out treatment from intervention centres 1%
Lamers et al. [49] Usual care Nurse-led minimal psychological intervention (MPI) Patients who reported knowledge of MPI 9/178 (5%)
Lee & Gayp [37] Attention control Sleep hygiene package Patient-reported use of: Bassinet;
White noise device;
Low lighting
33/46 (72%)p
47/75 (62%)c
11/75 (14%)c
27/75 (36%)c
Merritt et al. [50] No intervention Postcards with information about depression Patients reporting having seen the postcards 7/78 (1%)
Moadel et al. [51] Standard care Smoking cessation group support and encouragement Patients reporting discussion of active intervention patients;
Patients reporting familiarity with program’s strategies
6%
17%
Mohr et al. [52] Treatment as usual Cognitive behavioural therapy Patients who had contact with non-study therapist 18/44 (41%)
Phillips et al. [53] Routine public health practice Community engagement in healthy eating Participants reporting participation in intervention programme 1%
Saitz et al. [54] Usual care Chronic care management (multidisciplinary care coordination; motivational therapy; counselling) Patients who received a session of motivational enhancement therapy 9/281 (3%)
Shemilt et al. [55] No funding for breakfast club Funding for school-based breakfast club School pupils with school breakfast club 77%
Stewart-Brown et al. [56] No intervention Incredible Years (parenting techniques) training Participants attending community-based parenting programme 4/44 (9%)
Waghorn et al. [57] Enhanced routine mental health case management Supported employment and specialist illness management Patients opting to transfer to intervention after 6 months 28/102 (27%)
Walpole et al. [58] Social skills training Motivational interviewing (MI) Patients whose treatment was MI adherent 37%
Wells et al. [59] Usual care Quality improvement therapy (CBT) and medications (assessment and education) Receipt of speciality counselling within 6 months 13%

pUsing participant-level treatment allocation

cUsing cluster-level treatment allocation