Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jan 8.
Published in final edited form as: Cell Rep. 2016 Aug 25;16(10):2699–2710. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.08.007

Table 1.

Summary Statistics for Distribution of Head Entries during the CS across Training Sessions in PPTg-to-VTA Manipulation Experiments

Control Halo Comparison between
Control and Halo

Session Slope Mean
(SEM)
p Value of Comparison
to Session 1
Slope Mean
(SEM)
p Value of Comparison
to Session 1
Z Value p Value
PPTg-to-VTA cholinergic
manipulation
1 0.004 (0.12) 0.10 (0.12)
2 −0.02 (0.14) 0.936 −0.06 (0.16) 0.578 −0.29 0.775
3 0.85 (0.22) 0.012 0.04 (0.22) 0.832 −2.03 0.042
4 1.38(0.28) <0.001 0.83 (0.19) 0.008 −1.45 0.148
5 2.55 (0.35) <0.001 0.89 (0.26) 0.004 −3.95 < 0.001
PPTg-to-VTA glutamatergic
manipulation
1 0.02 (0.07) −0.09 (0.08)
2 0.36 (0.15) 0.329 0.13 (0.12) 0.413 −0.29 0.773
3 1.37 (0.24) <0.001 0.52 (0.18) 0.023 −1.71 0.087
4 1.82 (0.35) <0.001 0.71 (0.22) 0.003 −2.31 0.021
5 1.87 (0.32) <0.001 1.58 (0.27) <0.001 −0.45 0.654
PPTg-to-VTA GABAergic
manipulation
1 0.01 (0.12) 0.26 (0.16)
2 0.25 (0.18) 0.459 0.31 (0.23) 0.908 −0.36 0.720
3 0.76 (0.24) 0.021 1.21 (0.34) 0.028 0.38 0.706
4 1.25 (0.26) <0.001 1.34 (0.40) 0.012 −0.29 0.773
5 1.68 (0.31) <0.001 1.53 (0.36) 0.004 −0.74 0.462