Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jan 8.
Published in final edited form as: Cell Rep. 2016 Aug 25;16(10):2699–2710. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.08.007

Table 2.

Summary Statistics for Distribution of Head Entries during the CS across Training Sessions in VTA Manipulation Experiments

Control Halo Comparison between
Control and Halo

Session Slope Mean
(SEM)
p Value of Comparison to
Session 1
Slope Mean
(SEM)
p Value of Comparison to
Session 1
Z Value p Value
VTA GABAergic
manipulation
1 0.01 (0.18) 0.62 (0.31)
2 0.46 (0.17) 0.161 0.14 (0.31) 0.339 −1.64 0.102
3 0.87 (0.18) 0.008 −0.20 (0.38) 0.098 −2.97 0.003
4 1.86 (0.29) <0.001 0.83 (0.33) 0.669 −2.89 0.004
5 1.80 (0.28) <0.001 0.63 (0.41) 0.973 −3.13 0.002
VTA glutamatergic
manipulation
1 0.28 (0.17) −0.35 (0.17)
2 0.35 (0.15) 0.821 −0.27 (0.19) 0.798 0.02 0.985
3 0.84 (0.24) 0.071 0.27 (0.22) 0.048 0.10 0.917
4 1.87 (0.20) <0.001 −0.02 (0.26) 0.287 −2.87 0.004
5 2.78 (0.31) <0.001 0.25 (0.24) 0.052 −4.31 <0.001
VTA dopaminergic
manipulation
1 −0.19(0.14) −0.28 (0.19)
2 0.41 (0.14) 0.07 0.18 (0.15) 0.253 −0.27 0.786
3 0.67 (0.22) 0.01 0.54 (0.21) 0.041 −0.07 0.946
4 1.47 (0.29) <0.001 1.09 (0.34) 0.001 −0.53 0.594
5 1.77 (0.31) <0.001 1.05 (0.42) 0.001 −1.22 0.222