Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 31;1(4):e181456. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.1456

Table 3. Agreement and Disagreement for LVEF 35% or Greater According to Echocardiographic Method and Imaging Modality Using LVEF by CMR as the Standard.

Comparison LVEF No. of Patients With Both LVEFs No. (%) of Patients
Both EF ≤35% Both EF >35% 2 EFs Agreed CMR EF ≤35% and Comparison EF >35% CMR EF >35% and Comparison EF ≤35% 2 EFs Disagreed
Echocardiographic EF 377 243 (64.5) 37 (9.8) 280 (74.3) 54 (14.3) 43 (11.4) 97 (25.7)
Echocardiographic biplane EF 204 134 (65.7) 18 (8.8) 152 (74.5) 34 (16.7) 18 (8.8) 52 (25.5)
Echocardiographic single-plane EF 130 80 (61.5) 17 (13.1) 97 (74.6) 18 (13.9) 15 (11.5) 33 (25.4)
Echocardiographic visual EF 375 271 (72.3) 25 (6.7) 296 (78.9) 24 (6.4) 55 (14.7) 79 (21.1)
SPECT EF 134 90 (67.1) 19 (14.2) 109 (81.3) 10 (7.5) 15 (11.2) 25 (18.7)

Abbreviations: CMR, cardiovascular magnetic resonance; EF, ejection fraction; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; SPECT, single-photon emission computed tomography.