Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 21;1(7):e185217. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.5217

Table 3. Linear Regression Models Examining Associations of Family Dinner Frequency With Dietary Outcomes, Adjusting for Family Functioning.

Outcome Effect Estimate (95% CI)
Female Participants Male Participants
Model 1a Model 2b Model 1a Model 2b
Fruit without juice, servings/d 0.11 (0.05 to 0.16)c 0.09 (0.04 to 0.15)c 0.08 (0.02 to 0.13)c 0.07 (0.01 to 0.12)c
Vegetables, servings/d 0.25 (0.17 to 0.34)c 0.21 (0.12 to 0.30)c 0.20 (0.10 to 0.30)c 0.19 (0.09 to 0.30)c
Sugar-sweetened beverages, servings/d −0.02 (−0.04 to 0.01) −0.02 (−0.04 to 0.01) −0.07 (−0.13 to −0.02)c −0.07 (−0.13 to −0.02)c
Fast food, times/wk −0.05 (−0.09 to −0.02)c −0.04 (−0.07 to 0.00)c −0.10 (−0.16 to −0.04)c −0.10 (−0.15 to −0.04)c
Takeout food, times/wk −0.04 (−0.08 to −0.01)c −0.04 (−0.07 to −0.01)c −0.06 (−0.10 to −0.02)c −0.06 (−0.10 to −0.02)c
a

Model 1: adjusted for age, mothers’ spouse or partner’s educational attainment, and family structure.

b

Model 2: adjusted for model 1 covariates plus family functioning.

c

Significant results at P < .05.