Table 3. Socioeconomic and Regulatory Factors Contributing to the Association of the Vote for the Republican Presidential Candidate in 2016 With Rates of Chronic Opioid Prescriptions .
Socioeconomic or Regulatory Factora | R2 | Parameter Estimateb | Standard Error | P Value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model | Partial | ||||
Model 1 | 0.18 | ||||
Intercept | 7.50 | 0.23 | <.001 | ||
% Republican presidential vote | 0.18 | 0.09 | 0.004 | <.001 | |
Model 2 | 0.44 | ||||
Intercept | 13.65 | 1.98 | <.001 | ||
% Republican presidential vote (each 1% increase) | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.005 | <.001 | |
% Original entitlement as disabled (1% increase) | 0.04 | 0.12 | 0.01 | <.001 | |
Median household income, per $1000 (1% increase) | 0.02 | −0.05 | 0.007 | <.001 | |
% Part D coverage (1% increase) | 0.02 | −0.07 | 0.009 | <.001 | |
Unemployment (1% increase) | 0.01 | 0.13 | 0.02 | <.001 | |
% With ≥3 comorbidities (1% increase) | 0.007 | −0.05 | 0.01 | <.001 | |
% Adult high school graduate (1% increase) | 0.007 | −0.05 | 0.01 | <.001 | |
% Married (1% increase) | 0.003 | 0.04 | 0.01 | .001 | |
Ruralityc (1 unit increase) | 0.003 | −0.07 | 0.02 | .004 | |
% Single household (1% increase) | 0.002 | 0.04 | 0.02 | .02 | |
% HMO (1% increase) | 0.002 | −0.01 | 0.004 | .03 | |
% Non-Hispanic white (1% increase) | 0.001 | 0.009 | 0.006 | .13 | |
% Medicaid eligible (1% increase) | <0.001 | −0.01 | 0.01 | .35 | |
% Male (1% increase) | <0.001 | 0.01 | 0.02 | .46 | |
Religious attendance per 1000 population (1% increase) | <0.001 | <.001 | <.001 | .88 | |
Model 3 | 0.46 | ||||
Intercept | 12.05 | 1.98 | <.001 | ||
% Republican presidential vote | 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.005 | <.001 | |
% Original entitlement as disabled | 0.05 | 0.12 | 0.01 | <.001 | |
Median household income, per $1000 | 0.02 | −0.05 | 0.007 | <.001 | |
% Part D coverage | 0.02 | −0.07 | 0.009 | <.001 | |
Unemployment | 0.008 | 0.10 | 0.02 | <.001 | |
% With ≥3 comorbidities | 0.009 | −0.06 | 0.01 | <.001 | |
% Adult high school graduate | 0.004 | −0.04 | 0.01 | <.001 | |
% Married | 0.003 | 0.04 | 0.01 | .001 | |
Ruralityc | <0.001 | −0.02 | 0.03 | .32 | |
% Single household | 0.003 | 0.06 | 0.02 | .002 | |
% HMO | <0.001 | −0.007 | 0.004 | .13 | |
% White | 0.001 | 0.01 | 0.006 | .04 | |
% Medicaid eligible | <0.001 | −0.01 | 0.01 | .26 | |
% Male | <0.001 | 0.001 | 0.02 | .97 | |
Religious attendance per 1000 population | <0.001 | <.001 | <.001 | .12 | |
Opioid law category, yes vs nod | |||||
1 | 0.007 | 0.94 | 0.20 | <.001 | |
2 | 0.003 | 0.37 | 0.12 | .002 | |
3 | 0.002 | −0.36 | 0.13 | .006 | |
4 | 0.002 | 0.25 | 0.01 | .01 | |
5 | <0.001 | −0.16 | 0.14 | .24 | |
6 | <0.001 | −0.26 | 0.32 | .42 | |
7 | <0.001 | 0.40 | 0.34 | .25 |
Abbreviation: HMO, health maintenance organization.
The county opioid rates are adjusted for the individual characteristics of Medicare enrollees (shown in Table 1). Model 1 includes only the county percentage vote for the Republican presidential candidate. Model 2 adds county-level socioeconomic measures. Model 3 adds whether the state had specific regulations on opioid prescribing.
Parameter estimate is the change in response (rate of opioid prescriptions) for each 1-unit change in the predictor.
Rurality is measured by the US Department of Agriculture Rural-Urban Continuum Codes21: 1 indicates counties in metropolitan areas of 1 million population or more; 2, counties in metropolitan areas of 250 000 to 1 million population; 3, counties in metropolitan areas of fewer than 250 000 population; 4, urban population of 20 000 or more, adjacent to a metropolitan area; 5, urban population of 20 000 or more, not adjacent to a metropolitan area; 6, urban population of 2500 to 19 999, adjacent to a metropolitan area; 7, urban population of 2500 to 19 999, not adjacent to a metropolitan area; 8, completely rural or less than 2500 urban population, adjacent to a metropolitan area; 9, completely rural or less than 2500 urban population, not adjacent to a metropolitan area.
The state laws are classified into 7 categories by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.22 See Methods for description.