Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 22;1(2):e180450. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.0450

Table 3. Socioeconomic and Regulatory Factors Contributing to the Association of the Vote for the Republican Presidential Candidate in 2016 With Rates of Chronic Opioid Prescriptions .

Socioeconomic or Regulatory Factora R2 Parameter Estimateb Standard Error P Value
Model Partial
Model 1 0.18
Intercept 7.50 0.23 <.001
% Republican presidential vote 0.18 0.09 0.004 <.001
Model 2 0.44
Intercept 13.65 1.98 <.001
% Republican presidential vote (each 1% increase) 0.07 0.08 0.005 <.001
% Original entitlement as disabled (1% increase) 0.04 0.12 0.01 <.001
Median household income, per $1000 (1% increase) 0.02 −0.05 0.007 <.001
% Part D coverage (1% increase) 0.02 −0.07 0.009 <.001
Unemployment (1% increase) 0.01 0.13 0.02 <.001
% With ≥3 comorbidities (1% increase) 0.007 −0.05 0.01 <.001
% Adult high school graduate (1% increase) 0.007 −0.05 0.01 <.001
% Married (1% increase) 0.003 0.04 0.01 .001
Ruralityc (1 unit increase) 0.003 −0.07 0.02 .004
% Single household (1% increase) 0.002 0.04 0.02 .02
% HMO (1% increase) 0.002 −0.01 0.004 .03
% Non-Hispanic white (1% increase) 0.001 0.009 0.006 .13
% Medicaid eligible (1% increase) <0.001 −0.01 0.01 .35
% Male (1% increase) <0.001 0.01 0.02 .46
Religious attendance per 1000 population (1% increase) <0.001 <.001 <.001 .88
Model 3 0.46
Intercept 12.05 1.98 <.001
% Republican presidential vote 0.06 0.08 0.005 <.001
% Original entitlement as disabled 0.05 0.12 0.01 <.001
Median household income, per $1000 0.02 −0.05 0.007 <.001
% Part D coverage 0.02 −0.07 0.009 <.001
Unemployment 0.008 0.10 0.02 <.001
% With ≥3 comorbidities 0.009 −0.06 0.01 <.001
% Adult high school graduate 0.004 −0.04 0.01 <.001
% Married 0.003 0.04 0.01 .001
Ruralityc <0.001 −0.02 0.03 .32
% Single household 0.003 0.06 0.02 .002
% HMO <0.001 −0.007 0.004 .13
% White 0.001 0.01 0.006 .04
% Medicaid eligible <0.001 −0.01 0.01 .26
% Male <0.001 0.001 0.02 .97
Religious attendance per 1000 population <0.001 <.001 <.001 .12
Opioid law category, yes vs nod
1 0.007 0.94 0.20 <.001
2 0.003 0.37 0.12 .002
3 0.002 −0.36 0.13 .006
4 0.002 0.25 0.01 .01
5 <0.001 −0.16 0.14 .24
6 <0.001 −0.26 0.32 .42
7 <0.001 0.40 0.34 .25

Abbreviation: HMO, health maintenance organization.

a

The county opioid rates are adjusted for the individual characteristics of Medicare enrollees (shown in Table 1). Model 1 includes only the county percentage vote for the Republican presidential candidate. Model 2 adds county-level socioeconomic measures. Model 3 adds whether the state had specific regulations on opioid prescribing.

b

Parameter estimate is the change in response (rate of opioid prescriptions) for each 1-unit change in the predictor.

c

Rurality is measured by the US Department of Agriculture Rural-Urban Continuum Codes21: 1 indicates counties in metropolitan areas of 1 million population or more; 2, counties in metropolitan areas of 250 000 to 1 million population; 3, counties in metropolitan areas of fewer than 250 000 population; 4, urban population of 20 000 or more, adjacent to a metropolitan area; 5, urban population of 20 000 or more, not adjacent to a metropolitan area; 6, urban population of 2500 to 19 999, adjacent to a metropolitan area; 7, urban population of 2500 to 19 999, not adjacent to a metropolitan area; 8, completely rural or less than 2500 urban population, adjacent to a metropolitan area; 9, completely rural or less than 2500 urban population, not adjacent to a metropolitan area.

d

The state laws are classified into 7 categories by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.22 See Methods for description.