Table 3.
Multilevel Models of Daily ART Text Responses Predicting Daily MEMS Adherence among Participants in the iTAB Arm (n = 43)
| Effect | Odds Ratio | Estimate | Standard Error | 95% Confidence Interval | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | ||||
| Outcome: MEMS overall adherence | |||||
| Within-person level | |||||
| Text Response | 8.306 | 2.117*** | 0.501 | 1.135 | 3.099 |
| Study day | 0.960 | −0.041*** | 0.009 | −0.059 | −0.024 |
| Between-person level | |||||
| Text Response | - | − 6.269* | 2.753 | 0.874 | 11.665 |
| Outcome: MEMS adherence based on dose timing | |||||
| Within-person level Text Response | |||||
| Text Response | 17.479 | 2.861** | 0.827 | 1.240 | 4.482 |
| Study day | 0.966 | −0.035*** | 0.007 | −0.049 | −0.021 |
| Between-person level | |||||
| Text Response | - | 8.501** | 2.480 | 3.639 | 13.362 |
Note.
†
p <.10.
*
p < .05.
**
p < .01.
***
p < .001.