Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jan 8.
Published in final edited form as: Histopathology. 2011 Apr 4;58(5):803–805. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2011.03829.x

Table 1.

Clinicopathological summary of the eight CD15+ nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphomas (NLPHLs)

Case
no.
Age ⁄ Sex Pattern(s)* Treatment(s) Response Outcome Follow-up
(months)
1 36 ⁄ M C ⁄ D  –
2 49 ⁄ M A  –
3  77 ⁄ F C ⁄ E R-CEOP Dead  5
4 55 ⁄ M D ABVD ⁄ RT Dead  1
5 62 ⁄ M A ⁄ D RICE Dead 18
6 46 ⁄ M E ⁄ A R-CHOP Alive  3
7 68 ⁄ M D ⁄ E ABVD Partial response Dead  0.7
8 26 ⁄ M C ⁄ D ABVD ⁄ EPOCH-R ⁄ RT ⁄ BMT No response Alive 60
*

Cases were classified on the basis of the patterns of NLHPL described by Fan et al., denoting predominant/less predominant pattern.

ABVD, Doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine; EPOCH-R, etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin plus rituximab; R-CEOP, rituximab with cisplastin, etoposide, cyclophosphamide and vincristine; R-CHOP, rituximab with cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, vincristine, and prednisone with rituximab; RICE, rituximab, ifosfamide, carboplatin and etoposide; RT, radiotherapy; BMT, bone marrow transplant.