Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 21;63(1):e01801-18. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01801-18

TABLE 4.

Activity of antimicrobial agents tested against carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosaa and S. maltophiliab

Agent MIC (mg/liter)
% susceptible
Range 50% 90%
P. aeruginosa
    Cefiderocolc ≤0.03 to 1 0.25 0.5 100
    Amikacin ≤4 to >64 64 >64 48
    Ciprofloxacin 2 to >4 >4 >4 0
    Colistin ≤0.5 to >8 1 1 96
    Tigecycline 1 to >4 >4 >4 22
    Aztreonam 4 to >32 32 >32 22
    Ceftolozane-tazobactam 1 to >64 >64 >64 26
    Cefepime 8 to >16 >16 >16 7
    Ceftazidime 16 to >64 64 >64 0
    Ceftazidime-avibactam 1 to >64 64 >64 8
    Meropenem 2 to >64 32 64 4
S. maltophilia
    Cefiderocolc ≤0.03 to 0.25 0.06 0.25 100
    Amikacin ≤4 to >64 >64 >64 d
    Ciprofloxacin 0.5 to >4 2 >4
    Colistin ≤0.5 to >8 1 8 68
    Tigecycline ≤0.25 to >4 0.5 2
    Aztreonam >32 >32 >32
    Ceftolozane-tazobactam 1 to >64 >64 >64
    Cefepime 8 to >16 >16 >16
    Ceftazidime 2 to >64 >64 >64 8
    Ceftazidime-avibactam 0.25 to >64 64 >64 16
a

Data are for 27 P. aeruginosa isolates. Resistance mechanisms included VIM plus PDC (n = 12) and PDC alone (n = 4).

b

Data are for 25 S. maltophilia isolates. All isolates contained L1 and L2 β-lactamases.

c

Percent susceptible based on a provisional breakpoint of 4 mg/liter.

d

—, no breakpoint is available.