Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 27;5(6):ENEURO.0295-18.2018. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0295-18.2018

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

A, Regions active during haptic incongruency revealed by contrasting incongruent (ISh+ITx) versus congruent (CSh+CTx) trials. B, Region active during haptic congruency revealed by contrasting congruent (CSh+CTx) versus incongruent (ISh+ITx) trials. C, Region showing a different pattern of response to shape and texture incongruencies revealed by contrasting shape incongruency (ISh–CSh) versus texture incongruency (ITx–CTx) trials. Bar graphs on the lower row show mean beta coefficients within ROIs for each condition of interest (CSh congruent shape, ISh incongruent shape, CTx congruent texture, ITx incongruent texture; M motor, movement without haptic input; R, rest). Ang, angular gyrus; mFC, medial frontal cortex; MTG, middle temporal gyrus; SI, primary somatosensory cortex; SMG, supramarginal gyrus; R, right hemisphere and L, left hemisphere. MNI coordinates. Maps are thresholded at ***p FWE cluster-level = 0.001, **p = 0.005, *p = 0.05 (with cluster-forming voxel-wise thresholds of puncorrected < 0.001) and a minimum cluster size of 50 voxels. Note that the clusters in the SMG and MTG are further FWE-corrected at p < 0.05 at the voxel-level.