Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 20;6(1):1800927. doi: 10.1002/advs.201800927

Table 3.

Results for the comparison between LRRK2‐G2019S Inh2 and LRRK2‐WT Inh2

Assay and time point Features after selection AUC [mean ± std.] Accuracy [%] Sensitivity [%] Specificity [%]
Cell death 2w 11 81.1 ± 2.4 67.9 66.1 70
Cell death 3w 6 74.1 ± 4.1 67.5 67 68
Mitochondrial assay 2w 21 71.7 ± 3.1 66.7 84.6 46.2
Mitochondrial assay 3w 21 65.1 ± 3.7 62.2 83.8 36.1
Morphometric analysis 2w 20 52.2 ± 5.7 54.1 54.7 53.6
Morphometric analysis 6w 14 67.7 ± 4.1 62.4 80.5 38.5